ACLU lawyer accuses administration of “toying with national security, trans lives, and our collective health, for the sake of midterms”
On the campaign trail, Donald Trump called himself a “friend” to the LGBTQ community, but on Wednesday he announced a ban on transgender people in the U.S. armed services. (Source: Huffington Post)
Roiling LGBTQ advocates nationwide, President Donald Trump’s continued to trample on LGBTQ rights Wednesday, by announcing that transgender individuals will no longer be allowed to serve in the U.S. armed forces.
“This is an outrageous and desperate action. The thousands of transgender service members serving on the front lines for this country deserve better than a commander-in-chief who rejects their basic humanity,” said Joshua Block, an ACLU senior staff attorney. “There is no basis for turning trans people away from our military and the ACLU is examining all of our options on how to fight this.”
In a June 2016 decision that was lauded by much of the LGBTQ community, Barack Obama’s Department of Defense announced it would allow transgender service members to openly serve. Later last year, the DOD implemented training for its leadership and medical guidance for doctors to address transition-related medical care for transgender service members.
After consultation with my Generals and military experts, please be advised that the United States Government will not accept or allow Transgender individuals to serve in any capacity in the U.S. Military. Our military must be focused on decisive and overwhelming victory and cannot be burdened with the tremendous medical costs and disruption that transgender in the military would entail. Thank you.
Jonathan Swan, an Axios reporter, spoke to a White House official who suggested the decision was a political strategy ahead of the 2018 midterm elections. The official reportedly told Swan:
This forces Democrats in Rust Belt states like Ohio, Michigan, and Wisconsin, to take complete ownership of this issue. How will the blue collar voters in these states respond when senators up for reelection in 2018 like Debbie Stabenow [D-Mich.] are now forced to make their opposition to this a key plank of their campaign?
ACLU lawyer Chase Strangio, who famously represented former soldier and WikiLeaks whistleblower Chelsea Manning, responded to Swan’s report:
Oh good – toying with national security, trans lives, and our collective health, for the sake of midterms. We should all be outraged. https://t.co/YOn7yOmBJH
— Chase Strangio (@chasestrangio) July 26, 2017
Manning, who is believed to be the first person to receive transition-related healthcare while in military prison, tweeted Wednesday: “Today is further reason we should dismantle the bloated and dangerous military/intel/police state to fund #healthcare for all.” Manning also noted the cost of the government’s wildly expensive F-35 program:
Journalist Ali Abunimah, criticized Trump’s decision, while also pointing out the problem of advocating for anyone to be part of the U.S. military machine.
Trump’s attack on trans people is vile and violent. But “serving” in America’s global death machine is nothing any human should aspire to. https://t.co/Lyopz0UhDV
— Ali Abunimah (@AliAbunimah) July 26, 2017
Glenn Greenwald, a journalist and LGBTQ rights advocate, shared Abunimah’s tweet—noting his contribution to “the long-standing debate on the left when it comes to LGBT discrimination and the US military”—and refuted Trump’s claim that covering transitioning service members’ medical costs would be burdensome.
Beyond all the other criticisms, Trump's announcement is so cowardly: hiding behind the blatantly fictitious cost excuse. https://t.co/YhzpjgzG38
— Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) July 26, 2017
The nation’s leading LGBTQ advocates were quick to condemn the decision.
“This is an appalling attack on our service members; it is about bigotry rather than military readiness, reason or science,” said Mara Keisling, executive director of the National Center for Transgender Equality, which estimates that about 15,000 transgender people currently serve in the armed forces. “The President wants to discard thousands of trained and skilled troops who are already serving honorably and done nothing but be honest about who they are.”
“Today’s announcement violates the human rights of all transgender Americans. It lays bare the president’s prejudice and underlines the fact that creating policy based on bigotry is becoming a dangerous and cruel pattern for President Trump,” said Tarah Demant, Amnesty International USA’s director of gender, sexuality, and identity. “The administration continues to target minority communities without pause and without facts. From stripping protections from transgender students to today’s announcement, the Trump administration has made clear it has an agenda of discrimination.”
Advocates also pointed out how the decision blatantly contradicts Trump’s campaign pledges that he would be a “real friend” to the LGBTQ community.
— Lambda Legal (@LambdaLegal) July 26, 2017
Time and time again, President Trump's actions speak louder than his words. https://t.co/hxYmSMoSG4
— ACLU National (@ACLU) July 26, 2017
Democrats in Congress also decried the Trump administration’s decision.
.@realDonaldTrump can pretend this is a military decision, but it isn't. Banning troops on gender identity is shameful & makes us less safe.
— Elizabeth Warren (@SenWarren) July 26, 2017
This is discrimination, plain and simple. I stand with the brave transgender Americans who selflessly serve our military. https://t.co/VGck60O9G1
— Kamala Harris (@SenKamalaHarris) July 26, 2017
— Ted Lieu (@tedlieu) July 26, 2017
Trans service members aren’t a “disruption” — they’re brave individuals serving our nation. They should be thanked, not bullied by POTUS. https://t.co/JlDkVs7Y9r
— Rep. Barbara Lee (@RepBarbaraLee) July 26, 2017
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
You have used up your free articles for this month. To continue reading click here to login or subscribe.