Testimony, says one informed observer, is “just one big giant show that in no way can alter the provenance of key, damning evidence in Mueller’s possession.”
Washington, DC—(ENEWSPF)—July 12, 2018
A hearing regarding text messages sent by FBI agent Peter Strzok during the 2016 presidential campaign devolved into a chaotic shouting match between Republican and Democratic members of the House after the very first question when Strzok informed Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.) that the FBI had told him there were specific questions about ongoing investigations that he was not at liberty to answer.
Rep. Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.), the chairman presiding over the joint committee hearing, tried to force Strzok to answer the question from Gowdy regarding the number of witnesses interviewed as part of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into President Donald Trump’s campaign last summer. Strzok said he could not answer any questions about the ongoing investigation based on advice from the FBI’s general counsel.
Goodlatte threatened the witness with contempt over his refusal to answer the question, prompting angry responses from Democrats and demands for “points of order” and that the hearing be adjourned.
During @tgowdysc's time questioning Peter Strzok several Points of Order and Parliamentary Inquiries are made. @RepGoodlatte: "The chair is instructing the witness to answer."— CSPAN (@cspan) July 12, 2018
Full video here: https://t.co/Z4mqrbi022 pic.twitter.com/IO03BFIiuy
In his opening statement to the House Judiciary and Oversight Committees, Strzok condemned the Republican Party for its characterization of his private messages as evidence that his agency was biased against President Donald Trump, and for holding a hearing that he said amounted to “another milestone in our enemies’ campaign to tear America apart.”
Strzok noted that he sent text messages critical of other 2016 candidates including Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Hillary Clinton. He and an FBI lawyer he sent the messages to briefly worked on Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into the Trump campaign’s contacts with Russia, but were dismissed from the team last year even though FBI agents are not prohibited from privately expressing political views.
“Like many people, I had and expressed personal political opinions during an extraordinary presidential election,” Strzok said. “Many contained expressions of concern for the security of our country—opinions that were not always expressed in terms I am proud of…But let me be clear, unequivocally and under oath: not once in my 26 years of defending my nation did my personal opinions impact any official action I took.”
At Emptywheel, national security journalist Marcy Wheeler characterized the Strzok hearing as a “sideshow,” weeks after Wheeler herself was interviewed by the FBI about evidence that was then incorporated into the Mueller probe.
“As House Judiciary Republicans spend half the day or longer publicly flogging Peter Strzok,” wrote Wheeler, “know that all that flogging cannot change the fact that key evidence in Mueller’s possession, evidence which I suspect implicates the president directly, has absolutely no tie to Peter Strzok at all. None. Tomorrow will be just one big giant show that in no way can alter the provenance of key, damning evidence in Mueller’s possession.”
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
Representative Robin Kelly (IL-02), a ranking member of an Oversight subcommittee, who is participating in today’s hearing with 22-year veteran FBI Agent Peter Strzok, provided the following comment on today’s hearing:
This hearing with Agent Peter Strzok is a joke. We are wasting time & taxpayer dollars destroying dedicated law enforcement officers instead of getting answers on separated kids, North Korea’s nuclear program or payments to the Trump family from foreign governments. SMH— Robin Kelly (@RepRobinKelly) July 12, 2018
You have used up your free articles for this month. To continue reading click here to login or subscribe.