Fish consumption rates fail to protect fishermen and consumers
The Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen’s Associations (PCFFA) and the Institute for Fisheries Resources (IFR) put EPA on notice it could be sued under the federal Clean Water Act. The commercial fishing groups are joining a legal effort by Waterkeeper’s Washington, a coalition of statewide clean water advocates that sent EPA a similar letter on July 23.
“Salmon need clean water to survive,” said Glen Spain, of the Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen’s Association, the largest trade association of commercial fishermen on the West Coast. “The fact is, excessive amounts of toxic chemicals are getting into our water, poisoning fish and potentially destroying fish-dependent industries and communities. EPA has known about this problem for years and must finally require Washington to adopt a realistic fish consumption rate to protect hard working fishing families and public health.”
PCFFA, IFR—a research-based organization working with PCFFA to protect resources that are critical to the fishing industry—and Waterkeepers Washington are represented by Earthjustice.
“EPA long ago notified the state that Washington’s standard is simply not protective of human health, yet EPA has so far simply watched while the state failed to act.” said Janette Brimmer, an Earthjustice attorney representing PCFFA, IFR and the coalition of clean water groups. “The law is clear—EPA has an obligation to enforce the Clean Water Act and protect Washington residents with an updated fish consumption rate and human health standard where the state has not or will not.”
At issue is a formula for how much water pollution is allowed by the Washington Department of Ecology, based on how much fish people are likely to eat. Washington relies on an outdated system for setting fish consumption rates for water quality that assumes people in Washington eat about one fish meal per month, far less fish than studies show they eat.